Essay on Legalizing Marijuana Essay on Legalizing Marijuana In society today, many people look for a feeling of freedom. Many people go on vacation and spend money.
Along the blogging process, different topics were considered in which pros and contras were mentioned and discussed. This final statement gives an overview of the arguments I find decisive and important, and states my general conclusion about the title question.
First of all, I think that even if a clear conclusion or statement can be made about this topic, there will always be some valuable argumentations against this main conclusion.
Everything we find on the internet or is shown by the media is subjective, and therefore influences our conclusions. In spite of all this, I will now give the arguments I find the most important and decisive about the legalization of medical drugs.
Conclusion on legalizing marijuana, I will discuss the use of marijuana for medical applications and then I will argument on the use of hard drugs to treat people.
Several investigations have shown that cannabinoids, active components of Cannabis sativa, offer the potential as anticancer agents as well as palliative effects.
These palliative effects include inhibition of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, mainly in cancer patients. For these applications, the use of marijuana prescribed by a doctor is legalized in some countries. This use of marijuana in medical applications is very disputed, as the blog has shown.
Like stated on the blog, I think that people are very afraid of the use of marijuana as a medicinal substance. Because of this categorization, people associate it with criminality, violence, addiction, etc.
I think that most of these associations are exaggerated and are due to ignorance of the people. Marijuana does not, in comparison to other soft drugs like alcohol, stimulate violent behaviour.
Instead, Marijuana calms down the consumer of the drugs. A lot of people think that marijuana is a very addictive drug. As instead, this in not the case. Nicotine from tobacco for instance is much more addictive than THC, the active component of marijuana.
Like Bart Verbiest stated on the Blog: But also to the possible applications to aid the ones in pain.
They could lose a lot of votes of conservative people and will probably be looked at in a very different way. From the moment that the government starts the support of research and publication on this field, more people will look into the benefits of this approach, without being so narrow-minded about the use of drugs in medicinal applications.
Opponents of the legalization would say that there are other medicines with the same medical application and effect, but without the side effects of marijuana. If morphine had been consumed as drugs first, it would probably be illegal and never used in medical applications. Morphine and marijuana both have side effects, the only difference is that the side effects of morphine are socially accepted in medical environments.
Morphine is just an example to illustrate my point of view, but I think all strong medicinal substances have side effects when consumed in high concentration. On the other hand I believe that the brain damage caused by heavy marijuana consummation is an important factor that has to be taken into account.
At long term, use of marijuana has been linked with significantly increased probability of developing psychosis and schizophrenia. But again, I believe that almost all medicinal substances that are taken in high concentration for a long period will have severe side effects.
Although several scientific investigations have proven marijuana to be favourable for medical applications, not very much has been made public about this topic. I think that the pharmaceutical industry has a lot to do with this.
Because the pharmaceutical industry is very powerful on different levels, I think they would be tempted to slow down research about this topic. This could be done by not giving grants to these specific investigations for example, or by making a lot of publicity for other traditional medicines.Jul 27, · The New York Times Calls for Marijuana Legalization that conclusion after a great deal of discussion among the members of The Times’s Editorial Board, inspired by a .
Legalizing Marijuana Randy Scott Soc Martin DiBello Feb 6, Marijuana is currently an illegal substance made from the dry leaves of a hemp plant. It contains over chemicals. This substance has been given many different nicknames such as weed, pot, green, cannabis, skunk, and the list goes on.
Argumentative Essay Paper on the Legalization of Marijuana The legality of marijuana has been a hotly debated subject for decades.
Until the government of US and many other established countries outlawed its use, smoking marijuana had been a widespread activity for thousands of years. Dec 13, · Marijuana can't be regulated or taxed and that is the primary reason why the governments don't want peope to have it.
It does not have to be smoked, but can also be eaten, so the 'no smoking' lobby does not have a case against it, srmvision.com: Resolved.
Legalizing Marijuana Randy Scott Soc Martin DiBello Feb 6, Marijuana is currently an illegal substance made from the dry leaves of a hemp plant.
It contains over chemicals. This substance has been given many different nicknames such as weed, pot, green, cannabis, skunk, and the list goes on.
Marijuana is a gateway drug that leads to the use of "harder" and more dangerous drugs.
Among marijuana's most harmful consequences is its role in leading to .